Loading...
Loading...
An enterprise maturity initiative built to ensure security capabilities stick — not just ship. Coverage was treated as table stakes. Maturity required measurable outcomes, automation, and operational embedment.
Objective scores roll up to Domain, then Enterprise. Weak dimensions cap maturity.
Durability-first maturity model used to assess, prioritize, and sustain security capabilities across the enterprise.
The program established a consistent maturity baseline and a repeatable measurement system. Success was defined by whether a capability was deployed and whether it remained effective over time — through org changes, platform growth, and shifting priorities.
Coverage is necessary. Maturity is earned.
A capability was not considered mature unless it demonstrated strength across all four dimensions. Weak dimensions capped maturity to avoid “green dashboards” driven by partial implementation.
Single hierarchical view. Each row is scored 1 to 5 per dimension; overall is the average.
| Level | Coverage | Metrics | Tech / Automation | Process | Maturity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Security Maturity | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.00 |
| IAMDomain | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.00 |
| RBACObjective | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.00 |
| SecretsObjective | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.00 |
| Privileged AccessObjective | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.25 |
| Data ProtectionDomain | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.25 |
| Threat DetectionDomain | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.25 |
Roll-up rule: maturity is capped by weak dimensions — strong coverage cannot compensate for missing metrics, automation, or process.
Scoring scale (1–5)
Apply the scale independently per dimension (Coverage, Metrics, Tech/Automation, Process).