Loading...
Loading...
A reusable program pattern for controlling storage growth by enforcing retention policies at scale—paired with a forecasting model to quantify cost impact and guide policy decisions.
Without lifecycle management, data platforms accumulate historical data indefinitely. Storage grows every month, cloud costs compound, and cleanup becomes reactive and inconsistent.
Deletion relies on ad-hoc scripts, tickets, or manual coordination.
Volume increases monthly, driving continued growth in storage and query spend.
Inconsistent deletion creates audit gaps and increases governance exposure.
This program pairs (1) a retention service that detects and deletes expired partitions/files with (2) a forecasting model that estimates future volume and cost under baseline vs retention scenarios.
The outcome is repeatable cost control and governance: policies are enforced automatically, execution is safe and auditable, and leaders get clear visibility into cost impact and tradeoffs.
Vendor-agnostic by design. Swap in your platform equivalents (catalog, object store, schedulers, queues, compute).
Retention policies execute continuously with no manual cleanup or ticket-driven operations.
Deletes expired data to reduce storage footprint and bend the cost curve as volume grows.
Creates an auditable trail of what was deleted, when, and why—supporting governance and investigations.
Event-driven workers scale horizontally to handle dataset growth without re-architecting.
Large-scale deletion touches shared infrastructure (metadata catalogs, object stores, APIs). Guardrails prevent cleanup bursts from degrading query performance or overwhelming downstream services.
This program treats throttling and backpressure as first-class controls so retention can run continuously in production.
Diagram + component details for an event-driven retention service.
Forecasting method and scenario math (baseline vs retention).